Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00022
Original file (PD2013 00022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx       CASE: PD1300022
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20130821
SEPARATION DATE: 20050121


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty TSgt/E-6 (3M071/Services Craftsman) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition. She developed low back pain (LBP) in 2002, which persisted and was subsequently diagnosed as non-surgical; degenerative disc disease (DDD). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the operational requirements of her Air Force Specialty. She was issued a temporary P4/L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB); which forwarded, as the sole condition, chronic mechanical LBP to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The PEB adjudicated the condition as unfitting, rated 10%, IAW DoD and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. Additionally, the PEB identified a Category III condition (overweight) as not separately unfitting (nor eligible for rating, regardless). The CI made no appeal and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My rating should be increased because I served 14 years, 9 months & 19 days and had the evaluation board not pushed my packet through in record time, I would have been allowed to medically retire at 15 years. In addition, my back condition (degenerative disc disease) limits my mobility. I am unable to run at all, stand for longer than an hour or sit for longer than three hours without pain in my lower back. Due to this limited mobility, I have been unable to exercise like I used to. Therefore, I have gained approximately 30 lbs since discharge. I feel this weight gain due to my limited mobility has led to a diagnosis of Diabetes Type II. Which has not been rated by the VA.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting lumbar spine condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions (to include the referenced obesity and diabetes) are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Those, and any other conditions or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR).

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her service-connected condition continues to burden her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation. The Board likewise acknowledges the CI’s assertion that her disability disposition was unfairly rushed, and possibly deprived her of a retirement based on her length of service. It is noted for the record that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such allegations; and, redress in excess of the Board’s scope of recommendations (as noted above) must be sought through the BMCR.
RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20041102
 VA (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain
 5242 10% DDD, Lumbar Spine 5242 10% 20050311
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Right Inguinal Hernia 7338 0% 20050311
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50512 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Low Back Pain. The CI first reported LBP in October 2002, without discrete injury or precipitant; and, the pain persisted throughout the balance of her service. Initial X-rays were consistent with DDD. The Service treatment record (STR) notes occasional complaints of radiating pain, but no consistent radiculopathy. Multiple treatment modalities were pursued and the first temporary profile was issued, in May 2003. Magnetic resonance imaging in November 2003 confirmed single level disc disease at L5/S1 without neural encroachment. In the absence of neurologic complications, surgery was not indicated. A protracted trial of medications, physical therapy, chiropractic treatment, epidural/nerve root injections, and other conservative measures failed to restore sufficient functioning for military duties. Multiple entries in the STR document normal gait, normal lower extremity neurological findings, grossly normal or modestly impaired range-of-motion (ROM); and, there is no documentation of any periods of incapacitation. There are no documented gross ROM observations that would contradict the measured ROM evidence forming the basis of the Board’s recommendation. The narrative summary noted the CI’s current symptoms as “constant dull low back pain 2 out of 10 with new activity increasing to 7 out of 10 with activity to include normal daily duties at work with significant restrictions.” She reported an inability to “run or do sit ups, but able to do limited push-ups;” with additional note of aggravation with repetitive lifting. The physical examinations (includes orthopedic addendum) revealed a normal gait without comment regarding spasm or tenderness. Neurologic motor and sensory testing were normal. Lumbar ROM was described as “patient able to touch fingertips to mid shins bilaterally [roughly 70⁰ flexion], extension 5 = mild pain, lateral bend 25.” At the VA Compensation and Pension examination (2 months after separation), the CI reported a constant low backache of 2-5 out of 10 in intensity associated with morning stiffness; and, denied any significant neurologic sequelae. Aggravating factors included lifting greater than 30 pounds, stooping forward, sitting greater than 1 hour, and standing or walking greater than 30 minutes; and, the CI reported 6 days of work loss from the condition (no associated STR evidence). The VA physical examination revealed a normal gait, normal spinal contour, and the absence of spinal tenderness. No spasm was described, but some truncal guarding was noted with position change. Neurological findings were normal. VA ROM measurements were flexion 65 degrees (normal 90 degrees) and combined ROM 190 degrees (normal 240 degrees); with specific documentation of painful motion.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the PEB and VA applied the clinically compatible code 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine), and arrived at the same 10% rating under the VASRD §4.71a general rating formula for the spine which was accurate for the respective ROM’s in evidence. There was no sufficient documentation for incapacitating episodes which would achieve a higher rating under 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome). All members agreed that there was no separately ratable neuropathy for disability, since no functional impairment linked to fitness was in evidence. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the lumbar spine condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. Any concession to DoD guidance as referenced by the PEB is not applied to the Board’s recommendation. In the matter of the lumbar spine condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain 5242 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130109, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAF/MRB
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3770
Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762
Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx :

          Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-00022.
         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.
         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.
                                                               Sincerely,





 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02692

    Original file (PD-2014-02692.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Therefore, based on a thorough review of the evidence in the treatment record, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, a 20% disability rating was appropriate for the CI’s chronic back condition. BOARD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00044

    Original file (PD-2014-00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20070302 The VA coded the back condition as 5243 (Intervertebral disc syndrome) and rated at 10%.The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The exams proximate to separation did not document limitation of ROM, but both exams documented painful motionwhich would...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02149

    Original file (PD-2013-02149.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP)…”as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. There was no comment in regards to painful motion.His diagnosis was listed as“DDD of the lumbar spine with chronic pain with occasionaldisabling exacerbations usually non-radicular.”The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01560

    Original file (PD-2012-01560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was then medically separated with a disability rating of 0%. The PEB rated it 0%, and the VA assigned a disability rating of 20%. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00088

    Original file (PD2012-00088.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-6 (98C30/Research, Development, Test and Evaluation NCO), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) and right hip pain. The orthopedic examination performed on 14 February 2006, ROM was consistent with the MEB NARSUM examination and also indicated absence of tenderness or muscle spasm that would support a 10% rating using the general rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01324

    Original file (PD-2013-01324.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate Service disability rating for each of the pain problems. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a separation disability rating of 10% was appropriate for the LBP condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02592

    Original file (PD-2014-02592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Multiple entries in the STR document normal gait, normal lower extremity neurologic findings, grossly normal or modestly impaired range-of-motion (ROM); and, there was no documentation of incapacitation.The narrative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02289

    Original file (PD-2013-02289.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB only referred “chronic neck pain” and “chronic low back pain” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB physical examination noted decreased range-of-motion (ROM) of the cervical areas and tenderness with spine palpation.The narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 7 April 2004 noted the CI could not perform the duties of his MOS secondary to chronic low back and neck pain.A permanent profile U3/L3dated 12 May 2004 was issued for neck pain, CTS and a chronic lower back...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02203

    Original file (PD-2013-02203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lumbar Spine Condition . The examiner noted that three repetitions did not further reduce the lumbar ROM.Radiographs of the lumbar spine showed the transitional vertebra with normal spine alignment and normal S1 joints.At the VA C&P peripheral nerves examination on 25 April 2009 the CI reported back pain that radiated down both legs, at times to the heels. The VA rated the lumbar spine DDD at 20%, coded 5242 and denied service-connection for radiculopathy.